// CLOUD SECURITY

Azure Security Assessment

Azure environment review including Entra ID, storage, networking, and Defender configuration.

CIS AzureBenchmark
Entra IDDeep Review
CERT-InEmpanelled
CRESTCertified

Azure Security Assessment

Microsoft Azure is the cloud platform of choice for many enterprise and government organisations — but its security posture depends entirely on how it is configured. Entra ID (formerly Azure Active Directory) misconfigurations, over-permissioned RBAC assignments, publicly exposed storage accounts, and incomplete Microsoft Defender for Cloud coverage are consistently found in Azure environments of all sizes. Intelliroot's Azure Security Assessment provides a comprehensive review of your Azure security posture aligned to the CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark and the Microsoft Cloud Security Benchmark.

Our CREST-certified team conducts deep analysis of Entra ID configuration — including conditional access policies, guest user permissions, privileged identity management, and legacy authentication protocols — alongside subscription-level controls, network security, and key management. We use Prowler, ScoutSuite, and Microsoft Secure Score as baselines, supplemented by manual expert analysis of complex permission chains and cross-tenant trust configurations that automated tools cannot adequately assess.

Why Azure Security Assessment Is Critical

Entra ID Is the Identity Backbone

Entra ID misconfigurations — legacy authentication enabled, conditional access gaps, over-privileged guest accounts — are the primary attack vector for Azure compromises and Business Email Compromise campaigns targeting Microsoft 365 environments.

RBAC Over-Permissioning Is Endemic

Azure RBAC frequently drifts toward over-permissioning as teams request broader roles for convenience. Owner and Contributor assignments at subscription scope are common findings — each representing a potential path to full tenant compromise.

Storage Account Exposure Is a Leading Cause of Breaches

Azure Storage Accounts with public blob access enabled, SAS tokens with excessive permissions, and storage accounts without firewall rules continue to expose sensitive data at scale — from backup files to application secrets.

Defender for Cloud Gaps Leave Blind Spots

Incomplete Defender for Cloud plan coverage, Security Centre recommendations left unactioned, and missing Defender for Servers or Defender for SQL deployments leave significant attack surface unmonitored.

What We Assess

Entra ID & Identity

  • Conditional access policy coverage and gaps
  • Legacy authentication protocol enablement
  • Privileged Identity Management (PIM) configuration
  • Guest and external user permissions
  • Enterprise application and service principal review

RBAC & Subscription Controls

  • RBAC role assignment analysis (Owner/Contributor at scope)
  • Custom role definitions and privileged permissions
  • Management group and subscription-level policy review
  • Azure Policy compliance and enforcement review
  • Resource lock and deletion protection assessment

Networking & Storage

  • Network Security Group rule review
  • Azure Firewall and DDoS protection configuration
  • Storage Account public access and firewall settings
  • SAS token lifecycle and permission scope
  • Private Endpoint adoption and service endpoint review

Security Services & Key Management

  • Microsoft Defender for Cloud plan coverage
  • Azure Key Vault access policies and RBAC
  • Key Vault soft-delete and purge protection settings
  • Azure Monitor and Diagnostic Settings coverage
  • AKS security configuration (if applicable)

Our Assessment Approach

01

Scoping & Tenant Inventory

Enumerate subscriptions, resource groups, and Entra ID tenant configuration. Agree on access approach — typically a custom read-only role with Security Reader and Reader assignments across in-scope subscriptions — and define whether AKS or PaaS service-specific checks are in scope.

02

Automated Benchmark Assessment

Execute Prowler (Azure checks) and ScoutSuite against all in-scope subscriptions to establish a CIS Azure Foundations Benchmark compliance baseline. Review Microsoft Secure Score recommendations and Defender for Cloud alerts as supplementary data sources.

03

Entra ID & Identity Deep Dive

Manually analyse Entra ID configuration — conditional access policies, PIM assignments, legacy authentication, guest access, and enterprise application permissions — to identify identity-layer attack paths that automated tools consistently miss.

04

Network, Storage & Security Services Review

Assess NSG rules, Storage Account configurations, Key Vault policies, and Defender for Cloud plan coverage. Identify gaps in logging, diagnostic settings, and monitoring that would prevent detection of attacker activity.

05

Risk-Rated Reporting & CIS Scorecard

Deliver a risk-rated findings report with attack path narratives, a CIS Azure Foundations Benchmark compliance scorecard, and a prioritised remediation roadmap with Azure CLI, Bicep, and Terraform remediation examples.

Entra ID Azure RBAC Conditional Access Storage Security NSG Review Defender for Cloud Key Vault AKS Security CIS Azure Benchmark PIM

Frequently Asked Questions

A custom read-only role combining Reader and Security Reader permissions across in-scope subscriptions is sufficient for the configuration review and CIS Benchmark assessment. For comprehensive Entra ID review, we require Global Reader or a custom role with equivalent directory read permissions. We never require Owner, Contributor, or User Access Administrator roles, and we document every permission requested with its justification before the engagement begins.
The Azure Security Assessment focuses on the Azure resource and Entra ID layer. Microsoft 365, Exchange Online, SharePoint, and Teams security configuration is covered under a separate Microsoft 365 Security Assessment engagement. Both are commonly bundled, as the Entra ID review covers the identity layer shared between Azure and M365.
Microsoft Secure Score is a useful baseline indicator, but it does not assess the quality of your conditional access policies, the specific permissions granted by custom RBAC roles, Storage Account SAS token scope, or complex permission chains in Entra ID enterprise applications. Our assessment validates and extends Secure Score findings with expert manual analysis that the score cannot replicate.
Yes. Hybrid environments with Azure AD Connect (Entra Connect) introduce additional attack surface — including password hash synchronisation security, pass-through authentication configuration, and synchronisation account privilege. We include hybrid-specific checks for Entra Connect configuration, on-premises to cloud synchronisation security, and seamless SSO configuration as part of the Entra ID deep dive.

Deliverables

Executive Summary Report

Azure security posture overview with risk distribution, critical identity and infrastructure findings, and strategic hardening priorities for CISO and cloud platform leadership.

Technical Findings Report

Detailed findings across Entra ID, RBAC, storage, networking, and security services — with CVSS scores, attack path narratives, and Azure CLI/Bicep/Terraform remediation examples.

CIS Azure Benchmark Scorecard

Control-by-control compliance scorecard against the CIS Microsoft Azure Foundations Benchmark with current status and remediation recommendations for each control.

Entra ID & Identity Risk Report

Dedicated analysis of Entra ID misconfigurations, conditional access gaps, legacy authentication exposure, and identity-layer privilege escalation paths.

Compliance Mapping & Remediation Roadmap

Prioritised 30/60/90-day remediation plan with findings mapped to CIS Azure Benchmark, ISO 27001, and applicable regulatory controls for audit submission.

Retest & Closure Certificate

Complimentary retest of critical and high severity findings with a signed closure certificate accepted for compliance and regulatory submissions.

GET STARTED
Accepting New Engagements · 24h Response

Request a Security Assessment

Tell us about your environment and security objectives. We'll design a bespoke assessment and deliver a detailed proposal within 48 hours.

Scoping Call with a Certified Consultant 45-minute deep-dive with a senior practitioner — no sales pitch.
Proposal Delivered in 48 Hours Fully scoped engagement plan with pricing and timeline.
Free Attack Surface Analysis Preliminary external exposure report at no cost.
Fully Confidential. NDA Available. No obligation. Your data is never shared.
200+ Engagements
40+ Services
98% Satisfaction
CERT-In Empanelled ISO 27001 OSCP · CEH · CISSP
1
You
2
Service
3
Details

About You

We'll use this to route you to the right expert.

What Do You Need?

Select all that apply — you can pick multiple.

Select at least one area to continue.

Final Details

Optional context to help us scope your engagement.

By submitting, you agree to our Privacy Policy. We'll never share your data.